Which of the following is NOT a common law felony requirement for Hot and Fresh pursuit?

Get more with Examzify Plus

Remove ads, unlock favorites, save progress, and access premium tools across devices.

FavoritesSave progressAd-free
From $9.99Learn more

Prepare for the NLETC Arrest Search and Seizure Test. Study with diverse question formats, including flashcards and detailed explanations. Ensure you're ready for the exam!

The concept of "Hot and Fresh pursuit" refers to a scenario in which law enforcement officers can follow a suspect who is fleeing from the scene of a crime. This principle allows officers to make an arrest without a warrant under specific circumstances, recognizing the urgency and necessity of preventing imminent danger or the escape of a suspect.

Obtaining a warrant before entering is not a requirement for hot pursuit because the exception to the warrant requirement is precisely what hot pursuit allows. In situations where an officer has probable cause to believe a felony has been committed, they can act immediately and continuously pursue the suspect, entering private premises if necessary, without first obtaining a warrant. This reflects the law’s acknowledgment that waiting for a warrant could allow the suspect to escape or pose a danger to public safety.

The other options represent essential elements of hot pursuit: there must be probable cause that a felony was committed, the pursuit must be immediate and continuous, and the crime must indeed be a serious one, typically classified as a felony. Thus, the necessity of not obtaining a warrant is fundamental to the hot pursuit doctrine, allowing law enforcement to act quickly in the interest of public safety and justice.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy