Which of the following is a recognized exception to the Exclusionary Rule?

The Good Faith exception to the Exclusionary Rule is a well-established principle in the context of search and seizure laws. This exception allows evidence obtained through an invalid search warrant to be used in court if the law enforcement officers acted with a reasonable belief that their warrant was valid. This means that if officers relied on a warrant that they believed to be legally sound, even if it was later found to be defective, the evidence they collected may still be admissible.

The rationale behind the Good Faith exception is that the Exclusionary Rule is intended to deter police misconduct. If officers can demonstrate that they acted in good faith and reasonably believed they were following the law, the evidence should not be excluded simply because of a technicality in the warrant. This balances the need to enforce the law against the need to protect individuals' constitutional rights.

Other options presented, like the Public Safety exception, deals with situations where the immediate safety of the public may justify certain actions by law enforcement. While this is also a recognized exception in certain circumstances, it operates under a different principle. The Urgent Need exception and the Prior Conviction exception are not recognized legal exceptions to the Exclusionary Rule.